<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Knee-Jerk Review To “ZombieBland.”  (That’s Not a Typo).</title>
	<atom:link href="http://flimgeeks.com/blog/a-knee-jerk-review-to-%e2%80%9czombiebland-%e2%80%9d-that%e2%80%99s-not-a-typo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://flimgeeks.com/blog/a-knee-jerk-review-to-%e2%80%9czombiebland-%e2%80%9d-that%e2%80%99s-not-a-typo/</link>
	<description>Critical Media &#124; Movies, TV, Games, Comics and anything else that matters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 14:27:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MFLuke</title>
		<link>http://flimgeeks.com/blog/a-knee-jerk-review-to-%e2%80%9czombiebland-%e2%80%9d-that%e2%80%99s-not-a-typo/comment-page-1/#comment-116</link>
		<dc:creator>MFLuke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 01:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flimgeeks.com/blog/?p=1758#comment-116</guid>
		<description>I agree, pretty much across the board.  Zombieland falls into the category of &quot;movies with no point&quot;.  A continuous trend in Hollywood that is unfortunately becoming the norm.  What was this movie trying to say?  &lt;br&gt;It&#039;s not about the zombie apocalypse, it&#039;s about the people.  Oh, you mean the sometimes funny but mostly boring characters.  Good choice to make the movie about them (sarcasm).  This ain&#039;t Shaun of the Dead.&lt;br&gt;It&#039;s a re-imagining of the zombie lore.  Um, no, not at all.  One or two lines of dialogue max.  This is simply a zombie apocalypse story.  More post-apocalyptic actually as the non-specific calamity happened some time ago and there seems to be no urgency of action by any of the un-undead.&lt;br&gt;It&#039;s just a fun gore-fest.  Fail.  Although there are some good effects Zombieland is by no measure pushing the envelope.  I&#039;ve seen better zombie effects on awards shows (Scream Awards, but still valid).  There&#039;s very few lingering shots on the zombies.  A brief set up for a joke then a decapitation and/or sight gag.  No memorable gore scenes.&lt;br&gt;It&#039;s 88 minutes long with zombies in it.  That much is true.  &lt;br&gt;Zombies on the screen puts zombies in the seats.  It&#039;s not cool to exploit the zombie trend.  Although I and many others are compelled to see the new zombie flick it would be nice to see either a progression of the lore or a new addition to cannon to revel in.&lt;br&gt;P.S.  Bill Murray rules.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, pretty much across the board.  Zombieland falls into the category of &#8220;movies with no point&#8221;.  A continuous trend in Hollywood that is unfortunately becoming the norm.  What was this movie trying to say?  <br />It&#39;s not about the zombie apocalypse, it&#39;s about the people.  Oh, you mean the sometimes funny but mostly boring characters.  Good choice to make the movie about them (sarcasm).  This ain&#39;t Shaun of the Dead.<br />It&#39;s a re-imagining of the zombie lore.  Um, no, not at all.  One or two lines of dialogue max.  This is simply a zombie apocalypse story.  More post-apocalyptic actually as the non-specific calamity happened some time ago and there seems to be no urgency of action by any of the un-undead.<br />It&#39;s just a fun gore-fest.  Fail.  Although there are some good effects Zombieland is by no measure pushing the envelope.  I&#39;ve seen better zombie effects on awards shows (Scream Awards, but still valid).  There&#39;s very few lingering shots on the zombies.  A brief set up for a joke then a decapitation and/or sight gag.  No memorable gore scenes.<br />It&#39;s 88 minutes long with zombies in it.  That much is true.  <br />Zombies on the screen puts zombies in the seats.  It&#39;s not cool to exploit the zombie trend.  Although I and many others are compelled to see the new zombie flick it would be nice to see either a progression of the lore or a new addition to cannon to revel in.<br />P.S.  Bill Murray rules.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MFLuke</title>
		<link>http://flimgeeks.com/blog/a-knee-jerk-review-to-%e2%80%9czombiebland-%e2%80%9d-that%e2%80%99s-not-a-typo/comment-page-1/#comment-92</link>
		<dc:creator>MFLuke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 19:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flimgeeks.com/blog/?p=1758#comment-92</guid>
		<description>I agree, pretty much across the board.  Zombieland falls into the category of &quot;movies with no point&quot;.  A continuous trend in Hollywood that is unfortunately becoming the norm.  What was this movie trying to say?  &lt;br&gt;It&#039;s not about the zombie apocalypse, it&#039;s about the people.  Oh, you mean the sometimes funny but mostly boring characters.  Good choice to make the movie about them (sarcasm).  This ain&#039;t Shaun of the Dead.&lt;br&gt;It&#039;s a re-imagining of the zombie lore.  Um, no, not at all.  One or two lines of dialogue max.  This is simply a zombie apocalypse story.  More post-apocalyptic actually as the non-specific calamity happened some time ago and there seems to be no urgency of action by any of the un-undead.&lt;br&gt;It&#039;s just a fun gore-fest.  Fail.  Although there are some good effects Zombieland is by no measure pushing the envelope.  I&#039;ve seen better zombie effects on awards shows (Scream Awards, but still valid).  There&#039;s very few lingering shots on the zombies.  A brief set up for a joke then a decapitation and/or sight gag.  No memorable gore scenes.&lt;br&gt;It&#039;s 88 minutes long with zombies in it.  That much is true.  &lt;br&gt;Zombies on the screen puts zombies in the seats.  It&#039;s not cool to exploit the zombie trend.  Although I and many others are compelled to see the new zombie flick it would be nice to see either a progression of the lore or a new addition to cannon to revel in.&lt;br&gt;P.S.  Bill Murray rules.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, pretty much across the board.  Zombieland falls into the category of &#8220;movies with no point&#8221;.  A continuous trend in Hollywood that is unfortunately becoming the norm.  What was this movie trying to say?  <br />It&#39;s not about the zombie apocalypse, it&#39;s about the people.  Oh, you mean the sometimes funny but mostly boring characters.  Good choice to make the movie about them (sarcasm).  This ain&#39;t Shaun of the Dead.<br />It&#39;s a re-imagining of the zombie lore.  Um, no, not at all.  One or two lines of dialogue max.  This is simply a zombie apocalypse story.  More post-apocalyptic actually as the non-specific calamity happened some time ago and there seems to be no urgency of action by any of the un-undead.<br />It&#39;s just a fun gore-fest.  Fail.  Although there are some good effects Zombieland is by no measure pushing the envelope.  I&#39;ve seen better zombie effects on awards shows (Scream Awards, but still valid).  There&#39;s very few lingering shots on the zombies.  A brief set up for a joke then a decapitation and/or sight gag.  No memorable gore scenes.<br />It&#39;s 88 minutes long with zombies in it.  That much is true.  <br />Zombies on the screen puts zombies in the seats.  It&#39;s not cool to exploit the zombie trend.  Although I and many others are compelled to see the new zombie flick it would be nice to see either a progression of the lore or a new addition to cannon to revel in.<br />P.S.  Bill Murray rules.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

